Thursday, January 14, 2010

Going Where No Grind Has Gone Before

I've been playing the Star Trek Online open beta. Well, trying to mostly. The lag is intense, and I frequently crash out or suffer hitching or "server not responding" errors. But that's the point of beta. Hopefully they're gathering some good information from my playtime. I suffered a few issues, such as zoning into an instance without my party (I was supposed to zone into an open instance with another group, but I ended up alone, facing 15 Orions on my own. The battle did not go well.)

And sometimes I end up beaming back to my shop, only to somehow end up BECOMING my ship. Because of some strange quantum entanglement due to diapose leakage in the arlithiation chambers of course. Here's me, zooming around outer space:



But I have been able to play it enough to say: I'm liking the game. It's exactly what I thought it would be. There are a lot of people who seem to hate it. It seems to me a lot of people don't like the instanced nature of the game. You know what, guys: get over it. Not every game can suck like Vanguard. I don't think an open world sandbox would really work with the Star Trek IP anyway.

The game really resembles Pirates of the Burning Sea in many ways. It is incredibly instanced, which some people criticized POTBS for as well. When you are flying around in sector space, you are in a different scale than in the battle zones, similar to how your boat was scaled differently when travelling between ports in Pirates of the Burning Sea.

Just like Pirates of the Burning Sea, ships fly around in two scales: sector space and system space. In sector space you fly much faster given the distances because you are technically going around at warp speed. You are also as bad as the planets on the map. In system space, you appear more closely to scale. It's fine, it's just an abstraction, and works better in this context than it did in Pirates of the Burning Sea where everyone turned into a speedboat half the size of a city upon leaving port until they got too close to a pirate.



Ship combat in Star Trek Online rocks. It's a lot of fun, especially with groups. Star Trek Online features an open grouping feature; while working on some of my episodes, when zoning into an instance, I would join an existing group to tackle the content. Not having to mess around with LFG is awesome.

Most missions (at least the ones I've tried so far) start out with some in space action and then transition for some ground based action. That's where this game is weakest.

Avatar combat is flaky. The animations are stiff, and when the enemies run up really close to you, the fights look funky. But, still, it's typical MMO combat: you tab over to your enemy, hit some hotbar buttons, and watch their shield and health bars go down.

One killer feature of the game is that everyone is a pet class: if you don't have a full group, the rest of your away party is made up of bridge personnel you can collect over time, or generic security officers (red shirts). This makes it really easy and accessible to solo, since you always have a full party.

But an MMO that you solo through entirely just isn't a true MMO is it? That's why it's great that Cryptic borrowed the Open Grouping concept that Mythic pioneered in Warhammer Online. When you start an episode you will automatically be grouped with other players who are working on the same quest. If there aren't anyone around, well you still have your pets or can LFG the old fashioned way. But Open Groups makes the game feel more organic. I'm playing on MY terms. I go to the system *I* want to go to. But I get to play with other people, if someone else is working on the same thing I am. All without having to sit around, twiddling my thumbs, spamming in a chat channel.

Is Star Trek Online innovative? No, not really. It's standard MMO gameplay, but it builds on the most recent innovations in MMO gameplay (open groups, public quests via Fleet Actions, etc.). Is it true to the IP? I think so. Granted, I haven't had the opportunity to use diplomacy yet (though I hear they have those missions), and the game is much more trigger happy than the series. That's probably to be expected, really, since all MMOs tend to be about groups of heroes valiantly banding together to commit genocide on the local wildlife. That's Lord of the Rings Online in a nutshell. At least in Star Trek Online, it's mostly humanoids we're slaughtering.

It would be nice if they had stolen Vanguard: Saga of Heroes diplomacy card game mechanics to provide additional non-combat avenues for playing. But the game is complete enough that I'm quite content with what it offers.

The zone chat is filled with people who aren't though. Mostly, I think, it boils down to these issues: too many instances and too much combat. Too many instances - yes, it's annoying to click on every door and watch a loading screen, but Star Trek wouldn't really work well as a open world sandbox. It's more about the episodes (e.g., the quest system) and quests just work better with instances and scripting.

As for too much combat, well, yes, Vangaurd's diplomacy system, Oblivions speechcraft system, or even Spore's dance-off contests would have been a nice addition, but you know what? As much as I'd love to dance that Klingon ambassador into accepting my terms, most video game players, especially with a group, simply enjoy combat more. So it's naturaly they would focus on that. I'm sure if we hound Cryptic long enough, they'll add some more gameplay systems as well.

But the game is quite complete already and a good foundation for much more to come. The open group instances system makes playing on my terms fun by taking out the more tedious aspects of MMO grouping while still encouraging socialization. Every MMO from now on should build in matchmaker or auto-grouping systems. Sure, it would be nice if I could explore strange new lands without having to blow everyone up, but it's REALLY FUN when we do. Ship combat, in particular, is a blast.

So, I say: Beam Me UP, Cryptic.

6 comments:

Longasc said...

I don't know PotBS, but Starfleet Command I-III combat was like this already, and this dates back to prior to 2002 (SFC3).

I like the combat, too. There is a lot of bugs and a lot to hate, I can't get over the sluggish movement and anims in ground animations.

But I decided to buy it. It is a bit like my beloved SFC3 in space. I am afraid Cryptic will ruin it in the end. IMO they double-dip too much, 2 char slots is a bit hard for a subscription game, given that one will be Fed and one quite probably Klingon. I am @Longasc, how original. Feel free to message me. :)

Blue Kae said...

Don't listen to Longasc. We were on an away mission last night and I saw him having fun.

Look me up next time you'r in beta. My Cryptic handle is @BlueKae.

Jayedub said...

Nice write up. I love the ship combat in PotBS, so I am excited about giving STO a try during beta.

Corwin.EoL said...

See you in beta.

wsxwhx601 said...

免費視訊聊天室 - 免費視訊聊天室 - 小杜情色網 - 1007視訊 - 音樂試聽 - 試聽音樂 - 亞州視訊情色聊天室 - 情色視訊秀 - 視訊情色秀 - 情色部落格 - 色情聊天室 - 情色電話 - 免費視訊秀 - 色情視訊網 - 自拍電影免費下載 - 免即時通日本視訊 - 免即時通日本視訊 - 361色情成人電影下載 - 女學生自拍電影貼片區 - 線上色情電影 - 卡通色情貼圖 - 視訊交友視訊秀 - 日本美少女 - 大陸美少女 - 自拍台灣自拍 - 大陸自拍 - 美女掰穴 - 淫妹掰穴 - 視訊辣妹 - 視訊女主播 - 辣妹影音視訊 - 台灣辣妹自拍 -

Hechicera said...

Interesting.

The only thing is the reference to Vanguard's diplomacy. Sounded neat, but got boring very fast. There wasn't enough strategy ones you learned the game it was card-game grind. EQ2 and FFXI did better card games, just not as integrated to the combat part of the MMO (as you know).

Oh and the comment above me seems to be for erotic Asian video chat. Post must be confused about the holodeck. ;)